Hello team,
Google just sent a notice saying that my AMP pages have an error.
I use the AMP version of the theme (tagdiv AMP plugin) and nothing like it has ever happened to me.
The error is also very strange “Image size is less than recommended”.
You know what might be going on?
Some url with this error:
https://bit.ly/2RqKUHr
https://bit.ly/2srpBXh
and 124 url more
> Image size is less than recommended
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/article
image
Images should be at least 1200 pixels wide.
…
For best results, provide multiple high-resolution images (minimum of 800,000 pixels when multiplying width and height) with the following aspect ratios: 16×9, 4×3, and 1×1.
Same problem here.
At the moment it is a warning, but soon it will become an error. It would be better to solve it as soon as possible.
Hi,
Please check this topic, this is happen with original AMP too -> https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-search-console-image-size-smaller-than-recommended-size/
Thank you for message!
@ Calin,
Interesting. So that does mean its Google or one of the co-developers fault and they will come up with a fix soon. Right?
So, How to solve this issue, what’s the best and easy way?
Hi,
Please notice that’s not a problem which comes from our theme, sorry! Please keep in mind that AMP is a built-in plugin which was optimized and integrate into our theme according to the official requirements so far. It would be preferable that you use large images on your site to get the best results. More recently, it seems that Google has put these warnings for the images which are less than 1200 pixels wide (likewise, the height of portrait images should be at least 1200 pixels). The best solution, in this case, would be to manually replace your old image with another one which has minimum 1200px wide, sorry! For more information about this case, you can check the following topic here -> https://tehnoblog.org/how-to-fix-google-search-console-amp-image-size-smaller-than-recommended-in-wordpress/ because this aspect has also been discussed here.
Thanks for your understanding!
