Hi.
No. It doesn’t work.

Do I have to introduce some kind of specific element for blog header template?
I’m using Block Header 2

Simion C., I’m talking about Block Title. No entry title. The code you suggest is for Entry Title. I need to change de font site to BLOCK TITLE in a single block of my homepage with customized code. Any other suggestion?

• This reply was modified 8 years by llucson.

Solved. Just copy&paste the same html in mobile editor and solved. The page is visible in tag div mobile too. Thanks

One more thing: How can I show with tag div mobil plugin pages like about or contact? What is the best way?

• This reply was modified 8 years by llucson.

I am sorry. All I have said was for the responsive version of the main theme. Not for the plugin. That is: without activating the plugin (I prefer the responsive version), the custom code included in desktop version are also loaded

Sorry. Maybe I did not express myself well. The problem I am having is that by modifying the size of the title with a specific class will also modify the size of the category tag. And I want the category tag to be kept with the default size. See the atached pictyure

This is the .class code aplied to this module:
/* Amplia del tamaño del titular y blanco*/
.class11 .td-module-title a, .class11 a{
font-size: 40px;
line-height: 44px;
font-weight: 600;
}
.class11 .td-post-category {
font-family: 'Open Sans', arial, sans-serif;
font-size: 10px;
font-weight: 600;
line-height: 1;
}

+1 four columns layout

Hi.
I do not use child theme. I also do not use visual composer. Just Tagdiv composer

Thanks

I have repeated the process carefully three times (by ftp), and always the same error. Previously I deleted cache, disabled unnecessary plugins, etc. But always the same error. It only happens to me in the default template

Please, how can I fix it?

• This reply was modified 9 years by llucson.

In the themes that have been updated well I use the business template, but in this case that gives error is the default theme

Ok. Thanks. Do you intend to make the rows layout more flexible so that we can use more variations like 3/5-2/5 or others? I feel like I’ve been losing with this migration. Otherwise all very well, but the design of the row is very restricted, in fact very few options. Thanks