Yes, I do.

But in my case, this setting is already turned off since the very first day I installed the plugins.

Moreover, I don’t want to remove the button. I want it to redirect to non-amp version and not add &amp=1 at the end of the url.

Please check this section of the official documentation. They are mentioning only ?noamp=mobile and not &amp=1 after that. Is it hardcoded by tagdiv at the end of every link. Even when I click my logo, it goes to homepage.com/?amp=1. But I don’t use amp for homepage, so it redirects to homepage.com removing the amp part.

I’ve found that the content is laoded but not shown. Seems like some viewport issue. When I zoom out in my browser window, the hidden content shows up. I’ve attached another video to demonstrate the issue.

I tried deactivating all the plugins, but nothing changed. I am attaching a video recording. Please have a look. You can see the last article is only loaded half. It seems the extra content has been loaded but is hidden from the viewport. Like we use overflow: hidden; in css. IDK. Please show this to the developers.

Maybe because you have more people visiting your site than before. The extra load on your server might be causing the increase in loading time.
More the number of concurrent users, more the ram and cpu usage. This can be controlled to some extent through hardcore static and object caching.

Thank you Bettina

This is not what I was asking.
Let me walk you through.
When you click on the upload image (in the screenshot you sent), there are a lot of options to choose an image. For example, Add media(upload files, media library), create gallery. There there is an option at last—Insert from URL. Put this url (https://forum.tagdiv.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/team-bettina.jpg) and click on Insert into page. The image will not show on page.

And also an option to change “Share” text in the artice share buttons.

Thanks a lot, Bettina.

I have a few more points in my mind. Can I write them here or should I create a new post?

Thank you.

And what about 1,5, and 6. Are they discarded? Jusk asking.

2.) I could not find any option to edit the custom post type archive page. If you are referring to this, then I should tell you that it only creates single post template for the custom post type. Suppose, you create a custom post type named “Recipes” with the help of “Custom Post Type UI” plugin. This plugin asks you to choose a url slug for this custom post type and you put write “recipe” in that. Now when you create a new recipe post for, say, chicken wings, you write your post and click publish. With the custom post type option provided in the Newspaper theme, you can design how your single post(chicken wings recipe) appear to users. The url will be http://www.domain.com/recipe/homemade-chicken-wings(or whatever). Then you write 10 other recipes. All these recipes are present at http://www.domain.com/recipe/ which is the archive page. But you cannot change its design. Because it is a post format archive and there is no option in Newspaper theme for such archive’s customization. The option you shared with me only designs single posts published under a custom post type and does not designs the archive page that displays all the posts in the custom post type. It is like publishing a post in a category and desining the way it looks but not being able to design how that category archive looks. Just an example.

Hello!

I use this theme very actively and observe and analyze it very closely. I hope these points do not get ignored and find someplace in your checklist. If possible, please have someone from your development staff have a look at this. I’d be grateful. Also, this would make more sense to them. Some of the points that I want to make are—

1.) On news websites that write about the entertainment industry like celebrities, movies, TV, etc, you will see there are multiple types of taxonomy in the same place. What I mean by that is we normally put tags at the end of the content and it only displays one type of taxonomy that is tags or categories, but on some entertainment news websites a new taxonomy is sometimes created, for example, “People” or “Celebrities” to display names of celebrities at the end of content along with tags in the same line. Suppose, you write an article about the top five action movies and you have created a non-hierarchical custom taxonomy called “Movies“. And you put the names of the movies mentioned in that article into the “Movies” taxonomies and use “top movies” as a tag. But now you cannot display both of these taxonomies at the end of the article in a single line using a single shortcode. You have to place two shortcodes in two lines(it looks messy). To get a clearer understanding, you can see at the end of this article, there are quick links. You can see by hovering the mouse over them on the desktop that “Chelsea” is put into the “Team” taxonomy and “Jules Koundé” is put into the “Player” taxonomy. You’ll see the URL in the corner upon hovering. They are all different taxonomies but display in one line as a single element. With the Newspaper theme, it’s not possible. I know it sounds too complicated but I have a suggestion regarding the workaround. I write it below:
a.) The shortcode named “Single Post Taxonomy” can allow multiple comma-separated values for the “Taxonomy” field so that all the taxonomies can be displayed in one place. A new field named “Taxonomy Type” with values “hierarchical,” “non-hierarchical,” and “Both” can also be created for more ease and better UX. I say this because the hierarchical taxonomy shortcode like the one for the categories does not allow background color, border, padding, etc. for the additional text as the shortcode for tags does. This new shortcode after the update can be named something like “Single Post Taxonomies” or “Single Post Multiple Taxonomies”

—————————————————————————————————————

2.) A feature to display all the posts in a custom post type would be fantastic. A way to design custom post-type archives using cloud library templates and TD Composer. For example, I am using this Web Stories plugin by Google. It’s used to create Instagram-like stories on your website and shows in Google Discover and Search. But I cannot customize the archive page for my stories because it is a custom post type.

3.) I loved the new update. Especially, for its support for custom taxonomies, post types, and fields. One can easily create an archive template for the custom taxonomy but these templates still have very limited support for the custom fields. I’ll try to explain with an example. A tag has a “Name” field for the name of the tag, a “Slug” field for the URL, and a “Description” field for the explanation, which are all default fields. Suppose, I create a new taxonomy called “Celebrities” and I put “Justin Bieber“, “Lady Gaga“, “Tom Cruise“, “Kevin Hart“, and “Beyonce“, in the “Name” field. Now I want to add a custom field “Occupation” in the “Celebrity” taxonomy to explain the profession of the celebrity like “Singer“, “Actor“, “Comedian“, etc. In the Newspaper theme, there is no option to display this custom field information on the archive page of the custom taxonomy. Posts can display custom field information but archive pages cannot. A website called Screenrant has created a “Game of Thrones” tag. But the archive page for this tag displays a lot of information like Cast, Rating, Directors, etc., which are all custom fields. Have a look.

4.) There should also be a feature to show related posts based on custom taxonomies. There is an option to show posts based on categories and tags but no option for custom taxonomies. Suppose, I have written a post about Michael Jackson and I am using a custom taxonomy called “Celebrity” and “Michael Jackson” as a custom taxonomy tag. It would be great if it shows related posts with “Michael Jackson” used as a tag. You can say this can be done with default tags. But in tags, there is a lot of stuff, like topics, celebrities, and other keywords. A custom taxonomy provides more organization to content and it can make related posts more relevant if they show accordingly.

5.) There are three options(screenshot) in a post template to show taxonomies. a.) Single Post Categories, b.) Single Post Tags, and c.) Single Post Taxonomies. I experienced inconsistencies in the sizing convention of these elements meaning they look different with the same paddings.
For example, take a look at this screenshot.

6.) From three of the taxonomy shortcodes that I mentioned in the above point, one of them is Single Post Taxonomy(screenshot) which I only found in the latest update. I realized that it can be used to display any type of custom taxonomy. But it has the same sizing issue. It follows the “Single Post Category” shortcode’s styling. It even shows the same data fields like Tags Order, Tags Limit, and Additional Text. The only difference is you can put any taxonomy in the “Taxonomy field.” Please tell the developers to make the sizing more consistent for similar elements.

I have some more points that I’ll share tomorrow in the same post. For now, this is all. If you want more details on these points, please don’t hesitate.

Thanks.

The video does not include the edit part that I mentioned above.

To demonstrate this, I have created a new sample post. And this post is using default post template that I created through cloud library using tagdiv composer. You will see when I try to edit the post template, it opens with the new post that I created, not dummy data.

Edit: Please also note that when I click on “view” instead of “edit template with td composer”, it opens with dummy data. After that I can click green edit button from the top bar and it opens in TD Composer with dummy data.

Please see this video.

• This reply was modified 4 years by Prateek.

Hi, Bettina.

I have a very simple post template for defaul category(news). The template is set as global and when I click on “Edit With TD Composer” which shows after hovering over three dots next to the template name, it displays the latest post in TD Composer.

All the changes made do get applied to the post template, no complaints about that(apart from one mentioned in my previous reply). But it does not display dummy data. Maybe it’s an issue only I am facing. Can you try this on your system?

I also experienced this. Only way I could make it work was by clicking on view template through cloud template section first and then clicking the edit button in the top bar once it opens. For me, clicking on edit always opens the template with latest article in the tagDiv composer to edit, it never opens the actual template itself.

Thanks for the confirmation. Just wanted to know. Not at all that necessary on amp, actually.

Three Screenshots

Set rel attribute —> Disabled
Hide share text —> Unchecked
Hide like button —> Checked
Share align —> left

Share buttong style —> First one

SHARE LABEL
Share icon color —> #333333
Share text color —> #333333
Share background color —> empty/not set
Share border color —> #dddddd
Share border radius —> 5

SHARE BUTTONS
Buttons icon color —> #333333
Buttons text color —> #333333
Buttons background color —> #ccf9e5
Buttons border color —> empty/not set
Buttons border radius —> 5

FONTS
Share text font size —> 14
Share text font family —> Nunito Sans
Buttons text font size —> empty/not set
Buttons text font family —> empty/not set

Sure, Bettina.

Here’s the link.

When the icon is clicked, it seems like it has disappeared which confuses the visitors.

I know it doesn’t disappeare, it just seems like it. The tick mark should follow the color of the share post icons.

Also, please note that I have share icons with a very light background(#ccf9e5) the icons are dark(#1e1e1e).

Ideally, after click on copy url button, the tick should be dark as well but it’s white which hinders the visibility and not a good UX practice. It should match the icon’s color—whatever it is.

So that’s a bug, it means.

Alright!

Tablet viewport width is already set at 100%. It’s the height part that’s problemtic. I want the menu to scroll if the content doesn’t fit inside the viewport in terms of width. I am not opposed to scrolling—I want it. But it just doesn’t scroll.

Suppose, I have a page that displays some stuff in 8 small sections and I set this page to show up in menu(putting the id of page in menu item). What happens is that on desktop it will open fine showing 4 sections per row. On tablet/landscape mobile you want it to scroll down till the last section because you’re showing one section per row, but it just won’t scroll. I can’t figure out why.

If your screen is 1000px tall and the menu items are 1400px tall, the extra items in that 400px would not appear because you can’t scroll. Width is not the issue, height is.

Another example is the tagDiv popup builder which is great. If you display page content in popup, doesn’t matter how long the page is, it will let you scroll down to the very bottom till the last piece of content but in menu it is not possible or atleast I’ve been unable to achieve it.

You can emulate the issue on your side—
1. Go to this demo-https://demo.tagdiv.com/newspaper_music_life_pro/

2. Open the browser inspection tool.

3. Select iPad Air as the device or set 820 as width if the device option is unavailable.

4. Click on arrow icon beside FOR LIFE menu item (not the menu item itself, it would redirect).

You would find that a lot of menu content is below the screen/viewport height but you can’t access it because it doesn’t let you scroll down.

I can’t see why it’s necessary, Sir.
I’ve already explained everything in detail. Having a look at my website wouldn’t be of more use. That’s why I provided the screenshots.
I can try once more.

In CSS, if you add background color to an element along with border radius, that element will have background of that color and it will have round borders, but most importantly the color that is applied would not flow outside of the corners. Refer to the SECOND screenshot. It has round corners and the color is contained properly within the element.

Now, if I add background color and radius to a column using TD Composer instead of writing custom CSS myself, it doesn’t work very well. The background color flow out of the element’s rounded corners. Refer to the FIRST screenshot. The corners are round but the color is flowing out.

So, when I add background color using .custom-class { background-color: #f22b29; } instead of TD-Composer, it works fine.

I think it’s easier to understand now. If, for whatever reason, you’re unable to help without having to have a look at my website, please forward this to someone else. It’s that easy. I’d be extremely grateful.

Thanks.

I don’t know much about CSS and yet I’m more than sure that there’s no such thing as background radius. As much as I hate to say that, your replies has never helped me…never.

And I guess you didn’t read what I’ve written carefully — like always. Maybe it’s comprehension issue or perhaps related to language constraints. IDK

I urge you to forward this to someone more versed.

Thanks.