Search Results for 'image sizes'

Hi,

I want to have the featured image and thumbnail be standard 4/3 capability so none of the image is lost in either the featured image or thumnail. Which of your theme categories/styles combinations accomodate this.

Currently my featured image and thumbnail image ratios are not the same so I am losing part of the image. Also I would like to use standardised 4/3 ratio so I can use the free images available online.

Thanks for your help.
Eamonn

Hi Tagdiv Team,

When i am adding featured image to post it is creating multiple images based on the sizes mentioned in theme panel, But the images within the content are also creating multiple images.

Can i restrict that only featured images can only be recreated based on the Theme specified sizes and not the images with in the content.

Thanks

Hi there Newspaper team! 🙂

I have a question concerning thumbnail sizes. The post content width is 696px in Newspaper. However, you only get to choose between image widths 640px and Full Size when adding a media.

Bogdan, you wrote in the forum topic https://forum.tagdiv.com/topic/large-image-size-not-reflecting-media-settings/ that the 696px thumb is displayed automatically:

“Add the full width image to your post and the theme will use a thumbnail of 696 pixels which is the max content. It will not add the full image size.”

It doesn’t seem to be true. If you select Full Size when adding a picture, a full size picture will be displayed. Though there seems to be a 696px thumbnail, the post does not use is. Please see the following page i created on my site in order to explain:

http://www.parismalanders.com/test-image-size/

I checked this site from your Showcase to see if my problem was isolated, but it seems there is the same issue:

http://www.gloholiday.com/moving-new-home-sun/

This is I think a very important issue, especially concerning page speed.

Let’s say you upload four amazing pictures 1600*1400 (each 2MB) and insert them into a post in full size. The user will then have to load 8MB to see the four images, instead of the much smaller 696px thumbs. The problems is of course even more important for people using a mobile.

I am struggling with this problem since I use newspaper. I am forced to compress my pictures a lot, in order to obtain reasonable file sizes with bigger pictures (I use 1024 or 1280), which diminishes a lot the quality of the picture.

I’d be happy to hear your thoughts about that! Am I doing something wrong or is there really an issue here?

Best, Roman

as a consequence of upgrading to 8 and the subsequent image thumbnail regeneration of all new image sizes, the number of files in my uploads folder went through the roof and pushed me to the limit of my host allowance.
there are one or two plug ins trying to do that job, but reality is that if you are on the type of hosting where that file number is an issue, you probably won’t have the resources to run them. very buggy anyway looking at reviews.
i found a very useful and relatively straightforward method of deleting all of the old and no longer needed image thumbnails, in my case about 60,000, using ftp – sound advice from a hard core tech at cPanel.
I would be happy to write a ‘how to’ post the benefit of other users in the same boat – but do you allow that sort of thing? a guide written by a user?

I’m currently having problems on my new WordPress-website to upload new media with automatic image compression. These images are never larger dan 200 kilobytes, but still can take up to a minute (per image!) to upload.

I’ve contacted the developer of the TinyPNG-WordPress plugin (although I also got the same result with Smush It) and said the following:

In the attachment of this mail you can find a basic image (bixby.jpg) which is compressed to around 60-70% using Gimp, a screencapture (Capture.png) of the grey box with the blue bar, and finally of the file compression page you referred to in your mail. It seems around 20 different versions get created. The whole process per images takes well over a minute, so uploading 5-10 images for a basic article is nearly impossible.

They gave me the the following reply:

“There is nothing strange with the image itself. Just compressing that image using the web interface is almost instant for me. I also tried compressing the image using the WordPress plugin using 5 different sizes and that took about 15 seconds. If you have about 20 different sizes then it’s not too strange that it can take a minute or more. There are of course other factors as well that may cause it too take longer but the biggest culprit in this case is the amount of sizes per images that have to be compressed.

My advice would be to check which of these sizes you really need for your site. We see very often that users have themes that have 15+ image sizes for each image but they sometime only use as little as 3 of those sizes. If you can deselect some of those sizes you will immediately gain a huge speedup.”

Could you tell me what the best course of action is?

Hi,

I don’t want to generate different sizes of image whenever I upload them. How do I prevent Newsmag from doing it? I’ve already disable wordpress from doing so by changing the Media Setting in WordPress.