Search Results for 'update'

Hello! My WordPress site was running Newspaper 9, and this morning, I downloaded version 12.6.8. It says I’m registered, and I’ve updated the license key in System status using the original purchase code I got when I first bought the theme. When I “reset key,” it says “your theme is not registered.” I then go to “Activate Now” and enter the code again and hit “Activate.” The message I get is “Theme successfully activated. Thank you for buying our product.” I click “OK”. When I go to “Prebuilt Websites,” I get this message “An issue has been encountered while trying to validate your license key.”

Also, when I try to choose a prebuilt website, it takes me to the demo page. I can’t figure out how to actually install the prebuilt website. Help?

I have an issue on my planned site cheeselogs.co.uk that I can’t seem to resolve easily regarding the header.

I have installed the header REEL NEWS PRO on the site, it displays fine on desktop but on mobile view there is no white space between the end of the header and the start of the post (as seen on the left).

Using the Inspect function on the website, I can force it on the .tdi_3 tag.
The CSS would be:

@media (max-width: 767px) {
.td-container, .tdc-row, .tdc-row-composer {
width: 100%;
padding-left: 20px;
padding-right: 20px;
padding-block-end: 18%;
}
}

But I can’t seem to make this work on custom code.
Have got myself into a right tizzy with this header … have added custom code to force display of the SVG to none, and have probably added additional unlogical code to try and get it to do what I’m intending.

Some pointers would be appreciated. Thank you!

(For a future update, please consider adding more customisation to the header to make it easier to adapt)

Hello,

This topic is for a technical consultation on Newspaper theme.

We use the Newspaper theme from tagDiv on some of our websites, but we stayed at v8.7, the team who was in charge of maintaining these sites never updated it because of poor technical organization. Currently we want to upgrade the theme on all sites and move to the latest version 12.6.6

It is impossible to update it automatically because the theme management panel does not offer this option, so we followed the procedure described on the documentation to update it manually.

Unfortunately after installing and activating the theme, we noticed a behavior discrepancy on the site, in fact, the content of the site pages was no longer displayed correctly, and there were strange character strings which were embedded everywhere on the pages.

Is there a particular procedure that you can advise us to upgrade our version 8.7 to 12.6.6, or we have to do several upgrades going through the intermediate versions (9, 10, 11, then 12)? And if so, is there a repository where we can download these versions, because the merchant site only offers the latest version for download.

While awaiting a response, we thank you for the attention you would give to our request.

Kindly

I have been using v12.3 Compromise because all other latest versions crashed the website I am managing a VPN of 16GB RAM 4Core CPU. Every time I update to the latest version, within a second MySQL memory usage surges to 100% of the CPU usage. Virtually making the website not accessible

The only version that works well is v12.3 with our over 250k posts, other versions crash the site.
New the v12.3 download from (https://cdn.tagdiv.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Newspaper-12-3.zip) all needed plugins downloaded from the cloud, seem to have been compromised.

Problem: I woke up the morning to figure out that a javascript in been injected into the page causing a pop and redirecting to another site.

I have tried to update to a recent version but the website could barely load.
I have deactivated all plugins and themes, uploaded new theme files, and allowed the CDN to download of new plugins from the CDN. When I tested the homepage, the Pop problem came back.

How do we fix this,

If you want to check, I could give you login access

It seems that when using caching plugins, the Woo Menu Cart component is not updating properly.

I have currently solved this issue by following the steps here: https://docs.flyingpress.com/en/article/why-is-my-cart-count-not-updating-16ze19m/

i.e. adding woocommerce_items_in_cart cookie in the “Bypass cache” settings

Everything works correctly witht that settings, but it means that the site visitors don’t get the cached version of the site if they have a product in their cart.

It seems that the Woo Menu Cart component is not using AJAX to update the cart count.

Hello Tagdiv Team,

I hope you’re doing well. I’m reaching out to share some detailed feedback on the PCForge template in your Newspaper Theme. I think you’ve created something truly unique with PCForge, and I really appreciate your initiative in developing a WordPress-compatible PC builder tool—a feature no other theme provider has dared to approach. It has immense potential, and I’m very interested in using it for a project I’m working on.

The overall design is visually striking and the builder concept is incredibly useful, but I’ve encountered some structural and functionality issues that I believe could be improved. These adjustments would make PCForge even more valuable and practical, particularly for projects involving comprehensive component databases.

Structural Setup with Taxonomies vs. Custom Post Types (CPTs)
1. Current Approach Using Taxonomies:

• Currently, in PCForge, the PC components—such as Cases, Cooling, CPUs, Graphics, Memory, Motherboards, PSUs, and Storage—are organized as terms within taxonomies, rather than as Custom Post Types (CPTs). For example, in the CPUs taxonomy, we see terms like “AMD” acting as a parent term, with specific CPUs like Ryzen 5 5600X, Ryzen 7 5800X, and Ryzen 9 5900X listed as child terms.
• Each CPU term includes custom fields (e.g., Socket, Cores) using ACF fields of the “Text” type.

PCForge CPU Details (Field Group)
OC Forge Taxonomies

This structure raises several questions:

• Brand Representation: AMD, Intel, and other brands are currently set as parent terms within component taxonomies. However, brands are not strictly categories—they represent manufacturers. Designating AMD or Intel as parent terms within CPUs, rather than as brands, can be misleading and complicate organizational clarity. Typically, users expect brands to be a separate taxonomy or field to indicate manufacturers, not as hierarchical parents in a component category.
• Limited Scalability and Flexibility: The taxonomy structure for component categories appears limiting, especially when considering the need for specifications and compatibility filters. A CPT-based structure for each product category (such as CPUs, Motherboards, GPUs, etc.) would make data more manageable, with component-specific taxonomies and custom fields unique to each CPT. This change could enable better filtering and compatibility management, as each component could then be indexed, related, and filtered in more practical ways.

PCForge Graphics Taxonomy Terms
PCForge Motherboard Taxonomy Terms
PCForge Edit Motherboard Taxonomy Terms. MSI
PCForge Edit Motherboard Taxonomy Terms. B550 Tomahawk

2. Alternative Structure Using Custom Post Types (CPTs):

• Adopting CPTs for each product category would allow for a more intuitive structure and better scalability. By creating CPTs for categories like Cases, Cooling, CPUs, Graphics, etc., each could have dedicated taxonomies and custom fields, making it possible to implement unique filters and specifications relevant to each product type.
• With this setup, brands like AMD and Intel could be a separate taxonomy or a custom field within each CPT, offering greater flexibility in managing manufacturers. This structure could also simplify compatibility management, allowing for rules and filters that would prevent users from selecting incompatible components.

Compatibility and Builder Functionality

• At the moment, the PC builder isn’t working correctly when it comes to enforcing component compatibility. For instance, in the builder, I first selected the CPU field and chose “AMD.” This opened another field where I selected the specific CPU model, “Ryzen 5 5600X.” I then moved to the Motherboard field, where I selected “Asus,” which opened a field to choose the specific Asus motherboard. From there, I chose “Asus ROG Strix Z590-E Gaming WiFi.” These components are clearly incompatible, as the Z590 chipset only supports Intel CPUs, but the builder currently allows this incompatible pairing, which can mislead users and compromise the builder’s usability.
• Structuring component compatibility filters is crucial for a builder feature to deliver real value. Right now, without compatibility filters, there’s a risk of user error, which diminishes the reliability of the builder.

4. Challenges with Drop-Down Menus and Scalability:

• The drop-down menus in the current builder structure are manageable with a small selection of components (e.g., a few CPUs, motherboards, GPUs). However, in a real-world scenario where a comprehensive PC builder might handle thousands of components, these menus would become unwieldy. PCForge Builder
• A CPT-based structure, combined with compatibility filters, could better support a large-scale component database, and allow for more effective navigation, filtering, and component selection.

5. Seeking Clarification on Design Choices:
I acknowledge that I may be misunderstanding certain aspects of the builder’s structure, and I could be overlooking reasons for these specific design decisions. I would appreciate it if you could clarify the thinking behind this setup, particularly around the choice to organize components as terms in taxonomies instead of using Custom Post Types. Understanding the rationale behind this approach would be really helpful, as I’m keen to make the best use of the PCForge template for my project.

Offering Assistance
I genuinely love the PCForge concept, and I’d like to offer any support that could help improve it. I run a PC hardware store, so I’d be more than happy to provide compatible component data or any other details your team might need to refine the compatibility functionality or the component structure. I’m sure Tagdiv has the expertise to tackle compatibility logic, and I would be excited to see PCForge become a go-to WordPress solution for PC building.

Market Potential and Future Opportunities
I believe PCForge has the potential to be an industry leader if optimized to handle compatibility and larger datasets. Many users across forums frequently ask how to implement a WordPress-based PC builder similar to PCPartPicker, and no one has offered a concrete solution. Instead, recommendations typically include using CPTs. I know a good number of people purchase the Newspaper theme specifically for PCForge, and with further refinement, it could become the standard solution in WordPress for this need.

Thank you for considering this feedback, and please don’t hesitate to reach out if I can assist with any data or further insights. I look forward to seeing how PCForge evolves and to potentially using it as a core part of my project.

Best regards,

our url is
http://www.coettc.info
We just updated to version 12.6.8, and the website is broken.
What do we have to do to recover the website?
Thanks

Hello, with the latest Newspaper update some of my post images are not displayed on the public website (they do appear in the editor). Also the table of contents is not displayed correctly. My website is this one.

https://viajeconpablo.com/

I need help, thanks.