Search Results for 'block'

Hi

You can add a background color for the post title like here: http://screencast.com/t/qggFjqP2

.td_block_slide .entry-title{
background-color: brown;
}

The color can be changed as you want such that to obtain a better contrast with the image.
Thanks!

i test it. I have a problem only when i add element – all Big Gride and all Blocks. My problem is not plugins in conflict. I removed Big Gride now and work fine, but i want to have Big Gride or blocks on my top page

http://2paclegacy.net/

Can you help me?

• This reply was modified 10 years by calisangels.

Hi.. I managed to get the error message:

Catchable fatal error: Object of class stdClass could not be converted to string in /wp-content/themes/Newsmag/includes/wp_booster/td_block.php on line 145


// add a persistent atts based block class (crc32 of atts + block_id)
if (is_array($this->atts)) { // double check to prevent warnings if no atts
$this->add_class('td_block_id_' .
sanitize_html_class(
str_replace('-', '',
crc32(
implode($this->atts) . $this->block_id
)
)
)
);
}


I’m still experiencing EXTREME slowness in loading pages on the backend to edit them to the point that the browser goes unresponsive. Again, it is not all pages. It appears to be the pages with large blocks of HTML. All of the parameters in system status are set correctly and I even increased the WP Memory Limit parameter to 128 MB/request.

This does not affect the front end of the site which is very fast. This specifically has to do with the backend when loading pages to edit them and throughout the process of editing them in Visual Composer.

My site is running on a fast dedicated server so I know it’s not an issue with the power/performance of the server.

Please help.

This filter added to functions.php changes default WordPress jpeg compression from “90” to “50” … so, all those little thumbnails built by WP for blocks/modules are better compressed

add_filter( ‘jpeg_quality’, create_function(”, ‘return 50;’ ) );

the ’50’ in there refers to compression level, but not actually 50% — just the quality factor level on a scale of 1-10 as determined by WordPress — which uses GDlib/imagemagick to render new image files from what you upload.

Hi Catalin,

The issues above are solved thanks to your support!
New challenges are here to come 😉

1. The visual composer text block font size is different on posts and pages. At posts it’s correct, at pages the font is to small. You can try it yourself and see the difference when you paste the HTML code below on a page, and on a post.


[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]I am text block. Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

2. I’ve upgraded from the old v4 to the new v6. In the old version the i was used to edit text with ‘quote’ options. unfortunately they are gone in v6. Is there any possibility to use them again?

example: [quote_center]text[/quote_center]

Thanks again.

JB

My last post was just saying that it was fixed and describing what had happened and what fixed it:

We optimized the customization and it fixed.

Sorry if that wasn’t clear.

Thank you Alin!

I’ve been working on this on a development machine, so that is why it is not on our live site. I’ve been able to implement the code and CSS and it looks good.

However, the comment balloon/icon appears differently on the blocks and on a post page. I would like to have the same icon combination (the eye and balloon) found at the top of a post page, if possible.

Could you, or someone else at tadDiv, be able to provide help with this? Thanks!

Hello! after the version of the newspaper has been updated to version 6, the problem of moving the blocks is resolved.

Hello

I am sorry for the delay in my reply, but I needed to check before some things related with this topic.

I don´t know exactly what are the blocks that are not responsive by themselves. In my case, I use block 18 (just big picture), block 2, block 16 and block 7. I notice that each picture I upload for posts, automatically are generated 6 more with these resolutions: (696×385) (324×160) (300×200) (218×150) (150×150) (100×70).

I have never used image lazyload, I have to check to see how it works. In my case, I will try to see how I can place some articles or making some movements, it´s a good recommendation. I will take this into account.

I have seen that pictures I upload don´t have (696×385) exactly, I used to reduce just width but not height, and I suppose that it is the reason why theme generates this thumbnail, which it has even more size that my uploaded picture. So, if I upload pictures exactly (696×385), I suppose that theme take this one and it doesn´t generate another one, saving space on server.

I will try to use WP Smush and see how it works, maybe I could reduce time instead of compressing pictures manually.

If I use this tutorial code instead of using WP Smush, does it have the same results?

add_filter( ‘jpeg_quality’, create_function(”, ‘return 50;’ ) );

Thank you

Thank You Alin for the reply, but i am not being able to see the schema markup for the blocks, which i am using in widgets, and the related posts

Thanks. I am thinking though why not instead of editing CSS (since Code is not a Poetry for me :-)), I create an image block and place it on top of all other content, just below the menu… Will it not create the same effect?

Thank you Ing Geek, that totally makes sense. Analytic and Adsense seem to be very picky about js, no wonder, it’s how they control what they pay. I stopped using the speed options in cloudflare after a day or so of experimenting with them and afterwards, I only minify html in cache plugin. Those would brake up some functionality but I always assumed it was because I’m a lazy coder and my site is all patched up. I guess a simple static website with very good code can benefit from cloudflare features, specially rocket loader.

@mahmoudfathymohamed
Today I’m seeing no mixed content so I guess you fixed it 🙂 visited several articles and no content blocked and padlock was always green, I saw no problems like yesterday.

Moving to https is usually a good thing. It can lower your traffic acquisition from search engines if not done carefully though. Since http and https use different server ports (most), both versions of a website, if they exist, are considered individual websites. Since the content is the same, search engines will label one as a duplicate. Search engines don’t like duplicate shit. When there’s http and https versions of the same site, webmasters should take measures to inform search engine which version to crawl and index and which to ignore (robots.txt, rel canonical, htaccess)

You only have https version so you don’t have to deal with that. What you might consider is the “juice”. Before you went https, did you had any particular page/article that ranked well in search engines? Or did any “respectable” website linked to yours? If yes, then you are losing that SEO juice because those rankings and those links point to something that doesn’t exist anymore. If no, which probably is the case because you’re online since only 10/2015, then don’t bother.

Cheers!