Search Results for 'review'

Сделал сам: удалил рубрику “Featured category” и создал заново.
Комментариях в мобильной теме сразу после записи так и не смог сделать

Made by myself: removed the section “Featured category” and re-created.
The reviews for the mobile theme right after the recording was never able to do.

Catalin, it’s clear that the code regarding “ratingvalue” meta prop needs to be rewritten in order to allow Google to fetch “ratingValue” consistently with the rating system used by the end user. I don’t get the why you designed the code to normalize grades in a 1 to 5 stars format and let Google fetch THIS VALUE instead of my explicit 1 to 10 votes. Google allows every kind of vote, not just in stars from 1 to 5, but also in grades like A+ to F-, in 1 to 10, in percentages: your “Post settings” module acts accordingly to this implementation, but then forces the end-user to use a star system – since it’s otherwise going to be incoherent.

This section down here has been oversimplified in order to keep the code as simple and straightforward as possible, but it makes the rating system incoherent.

$buffy .= '<span class="td-page-meta" itemprop="reviewRating" itemscope itemtype="' . td_global::$http_or_https . '://schema.org/Rating">';
$buffy .= '<meta itemprop="worstRating" content = "1">';
$buffy .= '<meta itemprop="bestRating" content = "5">';
$buffy .= '<meta itemprop="ratingValue" content = "' . td_review::calculate_total_stars($this->td_review) . '">';
$buffy .= ' </span>';

There’s no point in allowing the user to choose which system to adopt if you force his pages to be fetched as per-design.
EITHER:
A) you remove the 1 to 10 or percentages based vote altogether, making the system unflexible;
B) you rewrite the code adding more variables and letting the user truly decide once and for all which rating convention should be adopted;
C) you leave the system half-baked, as it is right now, disappointingly.

Looking forward for your kind reply
Alessandro

The review is created and rated by the post author and displayed in the post page.

About WP-PostRatings plugin read there:

https://forum.tagdiv.com/topic/can-i-use-this-plugin-review-is-friendly-for-google-search-engine/

https://forum.tagdiv.com/topic/what-do-you-recommend-plugins-to-evaluate-the-article/

https://forum.tagdiv.com/topic/plugin-wp-postratings/

Hi Catalin,

I’m not talking about making a review articles. I want to let my readers leave a rating for my article by themselves.

Hello,

thank you for replying.

Sorry to be a stone in your shoe, but is it not possible to implement the same switch for modal option as it is for “images” (see screenshot below)?
https://snag.gy/MLwuEO.jpg
In short, disable modal preview for galleries site-wide.

Switch from the visual to the text editor and then paste the newsletter code inside the post where you want it to appear and then switch back to the visual editor. Preview the post to see if the newsletter shows up.

Спасибо. Нашел. Написал в loop.php
query_posts($query_string .’&cat=-**’); Заработало!
О комментариях вопрос еще актуальный

Thanks. I’ve found it. Written in the loop.php –
“query_posts ($query_string .’&cat= -**’);” Earned!
On review the question is still relevant

Ehm, No…it’s a theme’s function not an external plugin. I even copied here the code in the template’s core file (https://www.screencast.com/t/3qKH5ORt74)
$buffy .= '<meta itemprop="ratingValue" content = "' . td_review::calculate_total_stars($this->td_review) . '">';
That code is generating this (example screenshots):

Code in the article (as you can see it is generated by the theme):
<span class="td-page-meta" itemprop="reviewRating" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Rating"><meta itemprop="worstRating" content="1"><meta itemprop="bestRating" content="10"><meta itemprop="ratingValue" content="3.3">

So the problem isn’t mine, but the code is wrong. Here’s an explaination of what ratingValue is “The rating the reviewer gave” (source: https://yoast.com/rich-snippets-product-listings/). Well, right now the ratingValue doesn’t rappresent my vote, but the number of stars that i’m not even using (I’m using Point vote, not Stars).

I’m sorry but i think this isn’t a customization. This is a correction. The template vote is incoherent with the vote showed on the search engine results. If i put a vote of 7 out of 10 in the Review Page Settings then on Google you’ll see 3,5/5 and not the original vote like in every other site of my same category.
So why should i pay to fix a “bug”?